Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751607AbaJ0RFu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:05:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:58829 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbaJ0RFr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:05:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:02:37 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Johan Hovold , Romain Perier , heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, gnurou@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller" Message-ID: <20141027170237.GG2006@localhost> References: <1414427215-14380-1-git-send-email-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20141027163840.GA14253@saruman> <20141027164103.GD2006@localhost> <20141027164741.GJ14253@saruman> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141027164741.GJ14253@saruman> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:47:41AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:41:03PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:38:40AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:26:46PM +0000, Romain Perier wrote: > > > > As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename this property > > > > to "system-power-controller". Problem being that the word "source" usually tends > > > > to be used for inputs and that is out of control of the OS. The poweroff > > > > capability is an output which simply turns the system-power off. Also, this > > > > property might be used by drivers which power-off the system and power back on > > > > subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to remove "poweroff" from the > > > > property name and to choose "system-power-controller" as the more generic name. > > > > This patchs adds the required renaming changes and defines an helper function > > > > which is compatible with both properties, the old one prefixed by a vendor name > > > > and the new one without any prefix. > > > > > I think you still need to support poweroff-source since it has been > > > released on a stable kernel. Perhaps add a warning message telling users > > > it's deprecated and asking them to switch over to > > > system-power-controller ? Still, simply removing it isn't very nice. > > > > No, Romain sent a patch that replaced ",system-power-controller" > > with "poweroff-source". It's now in Mark's tree (for v3.19), and this > > series "reverts" to the old name minus the vendor-prefix. > > oh, so poweroff-source isn't in Linus' tree yet ? (/me goes grep) > > Then it should be fine. My bad. > > Many of the other comments are still valid because even though > poweroff-source isn't in mainline yet, this series still creates > bisection points which are broken. The best solution would be to drop > all those patches from Mark's tree. Read, not revert, drop. I agree. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/