Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:51:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:51:41 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust129.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.129]:46532 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:51:40 -0500 Subject: Re: HyperThreading in recent 2.4-ac kernels From: Alan Cox To: Gerald Britton Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021211183059.A19030@light-brigade.mit.edu> References: <200212112043.gBBKhLE28272@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20021211183059.A19030@light-brigade.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 12 Dec 2002 01:36:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1039657019.18467.65.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 15 On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 23:30, Gerald Britton wrote: > HyperThreading appears to work properly in vanilla 2.4.x, but fails to > initialize the sibling CPUs in 2.4.x-ac. The problem appears to be in > improper indexing by physical vs. logical CPU numbers. Thanks. Can you verify 2.4.21-pre1 is ok. That has the latest and greatest code in these areas and code -ac will drop its development atuff for. If 2.4.21-pre1 works all is cool, if not it would be very good to know early on - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/