Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757758AbaJ1HPK (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:15:10 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo02.lge.com ([156.147.1.126]:48814 "EHLO lgeamrelo02.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756882AbaJ1HPH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:15:07 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.213 X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:16:25 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim , Mel Gorman , Michal Nazarewicz , Naoya Horiguchi , Christoph Lameter , Rik van Riel , David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm, compaction: pass classzone_idx and alloc_flags to watermark checking Message-ID: <20141028071625.GB27813@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> References: <1412696019-21761-1-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz> <1412696019-21761-2-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz> <20141027064651.GA23379@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <544E0C43.3030009@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <544E0C43.3030009@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:11:31AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 10/27/2014 07:46 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:33:35PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > compaction_suitable() has one more zone_watermark_ok(). Why is it > > unchanged? > > Hi, > > it's a check whether there are enough free pages to perform compaction, > which means enough migration targets and temporary copies during > migration. These allocations are not affected by the flags of the > process that makes the high-order allocation. Hmm... To check whether enough free page is there or not needs zone index and alloc flag. What we need to ignore is just order information, IMO. If there is not enough free page in that zone, compaction progress doesn't have any meaning. It will fail due to shortage of free page after successful compaction. I guess that __isolate_free_page() is also good candidate to need this information in order to prevent compaction from isolating too many freepage in low memory condition. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/