Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:02:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:02:42 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust129.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.129]:40133 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:02:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] Dynamic MP_BUSSES and IRQ_SOURCES for 2.4.21-pre1 From: Alan Cox To: Greg KH Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021212015326.GI16615@kroah.com> References: <20021212015326.GI16615@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 12 Dec 2002 12:48:08 +0000 Message-Id: <1039697288.21192.18.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 959 Lines: 21 On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 01:53, Greg KH wrote: > If the machine needs more busses or interrupts, they will be dynamically > allocated at boot time. If not, the existing MAX_MP_BUSSES and > MAX_IRW_SOURCES value will be used. Once nice side effect of this patch > is when running a SMP kernel on a UP machine without a MP table, less > kernel memory is used than without the patch. > > This patch was originally written by James Cleverdon, and has been in > the -ac tree for quite some time. I also think Red Hat includes it in > their main kernel, but am not sure. Its certainly been in some of our trees. Marcelo this patch hasn't caused any problem reports in -ac for a long time. I'm all for including it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/