Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754116AbaJ1Rlk (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:41:40 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:44447 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752103AbaJ1Rli (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:41:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:41:35 -0400 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jason Cooper Cc: Dan Carpenter , Rob Landley , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Bolle , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [patch] Documentation/SubmittingPatches: Reported-by tags and permission Message-ID: <20141028134135.59dbc512@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20141028165827.GG15252@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1392333751.29034.3.camel@x220> <20140214093001.GA15933@elgon.mountain> <20141028090451.41ed6aad@lwn.net> <20141028165827.GG15252@titan.lakedaemon.net> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:58:27 -0400 Jason Cooper wrote: > At the risk of upsetting the apple cart, I'd prefer we downplay anything > that walks down the path of gamification (by focusing on credit). > > As best anyone has ever explained it to me, the Acked-by, Reviewed-by, > etc are there to impart information regarding a specific commit. In the > event that a commit is fingered in a bisect, you have a much better list > of names to Cc, instead of just the maintainer from MAINTAINERS and the > author from the top of the offending file. The author has often moved > on, and the maintainer may not have been around for the bugfix. As I understand it, having been in the room when these tags were developed and encouraged, was that credit was a big part of the initial motivation. We need more testers and bug reporters; this was a way to give them credit for the valuable work that they do. I still think that's important, for whatever that's worth. > I know Greg has spoken out against gamification before, and I also > understand the desire to encourage bug reporters. Perhaps I should just > suggest the following: > > """ > The Reported-by tag helps us maintain contact info for people with > intimate knowledge of a commit or a bug fix. Please seek the reporter's > permission before adding the tag to the commit. That said, if we > diligently credit our bug reporters, they will, hopefully, be inspired > to help us again in the future. > """ That addresses my concern, but loses the point of the initial patch: publicly reporting a bug can be seen as implicit permission to credit the reporter. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/