Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751591AbaJ1TJO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:09:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:46528 "EHLO mail-pd0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbaJ1TJN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:09:13 -0400 Message-ID: <544FE9BE.6040503@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:08:46 -0700 From: Florian Fainelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Brian Norris , Gregory Fong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lauraa@codeaurora.org, gioh.kim@lge.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, mina86@mina86.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: DMA allocations from CMA and fatal_signal_pending check Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmcsysport.c, I came across the fatal_signal_pending() check in mm/page_alloc.c which is there. This driver calls dma_alloc_coherent(, GFP_KERNEL) which ends up making a coherent allocation from a CMA region on our platform. Since that allocation is allowed to sleep, and because we are in bcm_syport_open(), executed from process context, a pending signal makes dma_alloc_coherent() return NULL. There are two ways I could fix this: - use a GFP_ATOMIC allocation, which would avoid this sensitivity to a pending signal being fatal (we suffer from the same issue in bcm_sysport_resume) - move the DMA coherent allocation before bcm_sysport_open(), in the driver's probe function, but if the network interface is never used, we would be waisting precious DMA coherent memory for nothing (it is only 4 bytes times 32 but still Now the general problem that I see with this fatal_signal_pending() check is that any driver that calls dma_alloc_coherent() and which does this in a process context (network drivers are frequently doing this in their ndo_open callback) and also happens to get its allocation serviced from CMA can now fail, instead of failing on really hard OOM conditions. -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/