Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753906AbaJ1TQF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:16:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52291 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753447AbaJ1TQD (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:16:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:12:21 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Kirill Tkhai Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Kirill Tkhai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Vladimir Davydov , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] introduce probe_slab_address() Message-ID: <20141028201221.GA2106@redhat.com> References: <1413962231.19914.130.camel@tkhai> <20141027195339.GA11736@redhat.com> <20141027195425.GC11736@redhat.com> <1414475091.8574.6.camel@tkhai> <20141028150102.GP3219@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <544FD8C6.5020606@yandex.ru> <20141028195542.GA1352@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141028195542.GA1352@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 10/28, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > > > Yes, probe_kernel_read() is in [1/3], but it's not the same as > > __probe_kernel_read() for blackfin, for example. > > > > It's defined as > > > > long __weak probe_kernel_read(void *dst, const void *src, size_t size) > > __attribute__((alias("__probe_kernel_read"))); > > > > But blackfin's probe_kernel_read() redefines this __weak function, > > isn't it? Didn't get_freepointer_safe() use to call architecture's > > probe_kernel_read() before? > > I _think_ that __probe_kernel_read(slab_ddr) should be fine. > > Yes, an architecture may want to reimplement probe_kernel_read() to > allow to safely access the special areas, or special addresses. > > But again, in this case we know that this address points to the > "normal" kernel memory, __copy_from_user_inatomic() should work fine. OTOH, perhaps probe_kernel_address() should use probe_kernel_read(), not __probe_kernel_read(). But currently it just calls __copy_inatomic() so 1/3 follows this logic. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/