Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755702AbaJ1Wbo (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:31:44 -0400 Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:49060 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755669AbaJ1Wbm (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:31:42 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Vinod Koul , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Antoine =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=E9nart?= , Russell King , lars@metafoo.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/58] dmaengine: Create a generic dma_slave_caps callback Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:31:50 +0200 Message-ID: <2404835.bBK1tFY7m2@avalon> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1414531573-18807-11-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> References: <1414531573-18807-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1414531573-18807-11-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Maxime, Thank you for the patch. On Tuesday 28 October 2014 22:25:25 Maxime Ripard wrote: > dma_slave_caps is very important to the generic layers that might interact > with dmaengine, such as ASoC. Unfortunately, it has been added as yet > another dma_device callback, and most of the existing drivers haven't > implemented it, reducing its reliability. > > Introduce a generic behaviour to implement this, that rely on both the split > of device_control to derive which functions are supported and on new > variables to be set in the dma_device structure. > > These variables holds what used to be the capabilities, that were set > per-channel. However, this proved to be a bit overkill, since every driver > filling these so far were hardcoding it, disregarding which channel was > actually given. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart You might want to consider adding "dmaengine: Move dma_get_slave_caps() implementation to dmaengine.c" to this series. > --- > include/linux/dmaengine.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > index b0efc805937a..be9e60aa8f5e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > @@ -593,6 +593,14 @@ struct dma_tx_state { > * @fill_align: alignment shift for memset operations > * @dev_id: unique device ID > * @dev: struct device reference for dma mapping api > + * @src_addr_widths: bit mask of src addr widths the device supports > + * @dst_addr_widths: bit mask of dst addr widths the device supports > + * @directions: bit mask of slave direction the device supports since > + * the enum dma_transfer_direction is not defined as bits for > + * each type of direction, the dma controller should fill (1 << > + * ) and same should be checked by controller as well > + * @residue_granularity: granularity of the transfer residue reported > + * by tx_status > * @device_alloc_chan_resources: allocate resources and return the > * number of allocated descriptors > * @device_free_chan_resources: release DMA channel's resources > @@ -642,6 +650,11 @@ struct dma_device { > int dev_id; > struct device *dev; > > + u32 src_addr_widths; > + u32 dst_addr_widths; > + u32 directions; > + enum dma_residue_granularity residue_granularity; > + > int (*device_alloc_chan_resources)(struct dma_chan *chan); > void (*device_free_chan_resources)(struct dma_chan *chan); > > @@ -783,17 +796,37 @@ static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor > *dmaengine_prep_dma_sg( > > static inline int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct > dma_slave_caps *caps) { > + struct dma_device *device; > + > if (!chan || !caps) > return -EINVAL; > > + device = chan->device; > + > /* check if the channel supports slave transactions */ > - if (!test_bit(DMA_SLAVE, chan->device->cap_mask.bits)) > + if (!test_bit(DMA_SLAVE, device->cap_mask.bits)) > + return -ENXIO; > + > + if (device->device_slave_caps) > + return device->device_slave_caps(chan, caps); > + > + /* > + * Check whether it reports it uses the generic slave > + * capabilities, if not, that means it doesn't support any > + * kind of slave capabilities reporting. > + */ > + if (!device->directions) > return -ENXIO; > > - if (chan->device->device_slave_caps) > - return chan->device->device_slave_caps(chan, caps); > + caps->src_addr_widths = device->src_addr_widths; > + caps->dst_addr_widths = device->dst_addr_widths; > + caps->directions = device->directions; > + caps->residue_granularity = device->residue_granularity; > + > + caps->cmd_pause = !!device->device_pause; > + caps->cmd_terminate = !!device->device_terminate_all; > > - return -ENXIO; > + return 0; > } > > static inline int dmaengine_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/