Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:28:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:28:52 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:6826 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:28:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:32:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20021212.123232.32776934.davem@redhat.com> To: stefano.andreani.ap@h3g.it Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: R: Kernel bug handling TCP_RTO_MAX? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <047ACC5B9A00D741927A4A32E7D01B73D66178@RMEXC01.h3g.it> References: <047ACC5B9A00D741927A4A32E7D01B73D66178@RMEXC01.h3g.it> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 679 Lines: 16 From: "Andreani Stefano" Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:18:21 +0100 Never say never ;-) I need to change it now as a temporary workaround for a problem in the UMTS core network of my company. But I think there could be thousands of situations where a fine tuning of this TCP parameter could be useful. You still aren't giving specific examples and details of the problem you are seeing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/