Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:33:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:33:32 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:12731 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:33:31 -0500 Message-ID: <3DF8F38D.E2A47634@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:37:33 -0800 From: Nivedita Singhvi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stefano.andreani.ap@h3g.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: R: Kernel bug handling TCP_RTO_MAX? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 23 > Never say never ;-) > I need to change it now as a temporary workaround for a problem in the UMTS core \ > network of my company. But I think there could be thousands of situations where a \ > fine tuning of this TCP parameter could be useful. > > Any contributes on the problem? If what you are trying to do is terminate the connection earlier, than reduce the tcp sysctl variable tcp_retries2. This should be the maximum number of retransmits TCP will make in established state. The TCP_RTO_MAX parameter is simply an *upper bound* on the value of the retransmission timeout, which increases exponentially from the original timeout value. thanks, Nivedita - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/