Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:45:19 +0000
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove redundant rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()
 function
Message-ID: <20141029134519.GC30198@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1414580827-19545-1-git-send-email-agordeev@redhat.com>
 <20141029124728.GL5718@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141029124728.GL5718@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:47:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:07:07PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Function rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() is called from scheduling-
> > clock interrupt handler to check if the current CPU was interrupted
> > from idle. If true, it results in invocation of RCU callbacks. But
> > the common hardware interrupt exit path also contains similar check
> > and therefore the call to rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() is redundant.
> 
> By common hardware interrupt exit path, you are meaning the calls
> to rcu_irq_exit()?  If not, please let me know exactly what you
> mean here.

Yes, I mean rcu_irq_exit().

> 							Thanx, Paul

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/