Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:17:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:17:32 -0500 Received: from chopper.slackworks.com ([64.244.30.42]:43534 "EHLO chopper.slackworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:17:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:12:03 -0500 (EST) From: Zac Hansen To: "J.A. Magallon" cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance In-Reply-To: <20021212205655.GA1658@werewolf.able.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020919) (chopper.slackworks.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1942 Lines: 49 > > No. The situation is just black. Each day Intel processors are a bigger > pile of crap and less intelligent My hyper-threaded xeons beg to argue with you -- all 4 (2) of them. , but MHz compensate for the average > office user. Think of what could a P4 do if the same effort put on > Hz was put on getting cheap a cache of 4Mb or 8Mb like MIPSes have. Or > closer, 1Mb like G4s. Err, syscalls are still going to take the same amount of time no matter how much cache the chip has on it. And, IMHO, adding more cache to make a processor faster is just as "dumb" as bumping the MHz. > If syscalls take 300% time but processor is also 300% faster 'nobody > notices'. > The point many are forgetting is that processors do a lot more than system calls. And P4's are quite quick at doing this.. especially those new 3+GHz ones (with hyperthreading). By the way, did everyone see the test on Tom's Hardware Guide comparison between the p4 3.06 with hyperthreading on and a p4 3.6 without hyperthreading.. http://www17.tomshardware.com/cpu/20021114/index.html For those of you who just want the info -- here's the spoiler -- when running multiple apps, the 3.06 can torch the 3.6. Check out the second benchmark on this page http://www17.tomshardware.com/cpu/20021114/p4_306ht-16.html 25% faster. Most of the other benchmarks don't show off hyperthreading, as they're running a single process, but from personal experience, it's nice. I don't know why they give you the option to turn it off in the bios. I have 2 xeons, and even then I leave HT on on both. I'd not even think about considering turning it off if I only had 1 processor.. --Zac xaxxon@slackworks.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/