Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757673AbaJ2Xft (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:35:49 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54561 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757287AbaJ2Xfr (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:35:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:34:38 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jiri Kosina Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, tj@kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann , desrt@desrt.ca, hadess@hadess.net, dh.herrmann@gmail.com, tixxdz@opendz.org, simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk, daniel@zonque.org, alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk, javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk, teg@jklm.no Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation Message-ID: <20141029233438.GA16520@kroah.com> References: <1414620056-6675-1-git-send-email-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <20141029231106.GB16548@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:26:33AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > > > It seems to me that most of the highlight features from the cover letter > > > > can be "easily" (for certain definition of that word, of course) > > > > implemented in userspace (vmsplice(), sending fd through unix socket, user > > > > namespaces, UUID management, etc). > > > > > > We have dbus in userspace today, but that requires extra copies of data, > > > > But we can do zero-copy between processess for quite some time already, so > > what exactly is the issue here? > > > > > and isn't easy, or even possible, to do some of the application-specific > > > bus logic that kdbus provides. > > > > I unfortunately have absolutely no idea what should I imagine here. > > Also, I think I have heard that binder is going out of staging now, right? Yes, but that needs documentation, which I'm working on at the moment :) > I admittedly have very limited understanding of both binder and kdbus, but > I guess that is the case for many folks. My understanding is that they are > providing very similar functionality, so explanation why we need *both* in > the kernel would be very interesting as well. They do very different things, see this writeup I did a while ago about the differences between them: http://kroah.com/log/blog/2014/01/15/kdbus-details/ thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/