Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:53:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:53:40 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:36834 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: <3DF93F2A.6090600@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:10 -0800 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE5.5; Windows 98; X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Suparna Bhattacharya , "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] kexec-tools-1.8 References: <1037055149.13304.47.camel@andyp> <1037148514.13280.97.camel@andyp> <3DEC1758.8030302@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 819 Lines: 21 I got around to trying it on a NUMA-Q again. It makes it well into the kernel this time. I've been getting some strange CPU numbering problems, but that was happening to a lesser extent before I threw kexec in there. Right now it's dying in the memory allocator, but that is probably just something that didn't get initialized right, or some cross-quad memory that isn't set up right. I would really like to see this go into 2.5. The fact that it gets this far on something as exotic as a NUMA-Q is a tribute to its maturity. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/