Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758660AbaJ3JyL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:54:11 -0400
Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:39891 "EHLO
	mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758591AbaJ3JyH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:54:07 -0400
Message-ID: <54520ABC.3040305@imgtec.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:54:04 +0000
From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
        Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>,
        <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <nbd@openwrt.org>, <yanh@lemote.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        <alex.smith@imgtec.com>, <taohl@lemote.com>, <chenhc@lemote.com>,
        <blogic@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: DMA: fix coherent alloc in non-coherent systems
References: <20141030014753.13189.48344.stgit@linux-yegoshin> <54520969.8030900@imgtec.com> <54520A2D.5080304@imgtec.com>
In-Reply-To: <54520A2D.5080304@imgtec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.149]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 10/30/2014 09:51 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Markos,
> 
> On 30/10/14 09:48, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
>>> index f9f4486..fe0b465 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon/dma-coherence.h
>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline int plat_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
>>> +static inline int plat_device_is_coherent(const struct device *dev)
>>
>> Why adding const here?
>>
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> Is it just a matter of consistence with the rest of the interfaces? Do
>> you need to move these into a separate patch since they don't quite fit
>> here.
> 
> See the new new call to plat_device_is_coherent(), which passes dev,
> which is const.
> 
> Cheers
> James
> 
Ah yes you are right. Thanks!

-- 
markos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/