Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760440AbaJ3SPH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:15:07 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0148.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.148]:34429 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757832AbaJ3SPF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:15:05 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:2899:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3167:3353:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13095:13311:13357:13618:14096:14097:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: rod69_838509d83052f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2208 Message-ID: <1414692902.22099.1.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: add error logging to early update driver From: Joe Perches To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:15:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20141030174134.GE11178@pd.tnic> References: <1410197875-19252-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <1410197875-19252-5-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <20141020150801.GE3524@pd.tnic> <20141021141015.GD22528@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20141030174134.GE11178@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 18:41 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:10:15PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > In fact, I have a patch somewhere that needs to add a new failure message: > > we have several failure cases which we want to differentiate, at the very > > least "processor didn't like it" and "it looks corrupt, so we didn't even > > try to install it". > > Actually, I don't want to be too chatty with the loader: if the > microcode blob passes checks but it is not for the current processor > we're running, not saying anything is what I want to do. > > Why? Because I don't want to disturb people unnecessarily - if the > microcode doesn't apply and everything else checks out, you simply don't > need it. > > If one really wants to know, one can always check /proc/cpuinfo and read > out the microcode revision from the blob. But that is for the 1% of the > curious ones - everyone else should simply install microcode blob and > boot machine. Fire and forget. > > Only the abnormal error cases should be vocal in saying what's wrong so > that we can actually address those. Maybe make it emit at KERN_DEBUG -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/