Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759274AbaJaK7e (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:59:34 -0400 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:46920 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758015AbaJaK7b (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:59:31 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7f956d000005ed7-97-54536b90ff2e Message-id: <54536B5B.1050604@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:58:35 +0100 From: Karol Lewandowski Organization: Samsung Poland R&D Center User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.1.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Kosina , Linux API , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz , Arnd Bergmann , Tejun Heo , Ryan Lortie , Simon McVittie , daniel@zonque.org, David Herrmann , Paul Moore , "casey.schaufler@intel.com" , marcel@holtmann.org, tixxdz@opendz.org, javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk, alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation References: <54520A21.20404@samsung.com> <54521697.1030900@samsung.com> <20141030144709.GA19721@kroah.com> <545297CC.6020306@samsung.com> <20141030231310.0b65b762@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-reply-to: <20141030231310.0b65b762@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7oTsoNDDNbN17S4svUIk8XfScfY LW6sWMBk0fT3FYtF9zUWi3mtR1ksJk35y2bRvHg9m8XR3wUWu+csZrE481vXYvP3DjaLy7vm sFl8+/SL0eLztV/sFu0rbjNarPy9nc3i1/KjjA5CHr9/TWL0+Pv8OovHjVkdrB47Z91l91i/ ezm7x+I9L5k8Nq3qZPO4c20Pm8f+uWvYPVpPbmL1WPHrCLvH+31X2TzOLACyPm+S89i+ezlL AH8Ul01Kak5mWWqRvl0CV0b3tMOsBX2sFRf/PmZsYPzP3MXIySEhYCIx58BJKFtM4sK99Wxd jFwcQgJLGSWmd6xmhXA+MUpcn3CfFaSKV0BLYv7CJ4xdjBwcLAKqEstbrEDCbAJGEt8ObQAb xC+gLvFu21MmEFtUIESi9UoLG0SroMSPyfdYQGwRoMXNr14zgsxnFrjMIrF8RgdYkbCAscSk E28YIRbvZ5TouQyR4BSwk1i99hsLyGJmoA1TpuSChJkF5CU2r3nLPIFRcBaSHbMQqmYhqVrA yLyKUTS1NLmgOCk910ivODG3uDQvXS85P3cTIySSv+5gXHrM6hCjAAejEg+vxpegECHWxLLi ytxDjBIczEoivP/Sg0OEeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MC5xfP3RoSja64Ta9mhv3ok/ NRvdAhQd0+N/Lsn5bRNy9tX5/euiTNXzF5zjWfCZ91uCW8THNXPfNZekfmv8WxRk95+pZYNt rL5EeWV1U/jsKRen7ldfuq4/YO3jTFa5Ddbb09m5tqmFXK/WkTlz62fWTenP4dd/abHackeX v3Z37CxZe/v/fyWW4oxEQy3mouJEAL7kCmTCAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014-10-31 00:13, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >>> The core calls are already mediated by LSM today, right? We don't want >>> anyone to be parsing the data stream through an LSM, that idea got >>> rejected a long time ago as something that is really not a good idea. >> >> Parsing data is out of question, of course, but this is not what we were >> proposing. > > Why is it out of the question. If it's a socket you can just a BPF filter > on it, so why can't kdbus support similar basic functionality ? Fair point. I think that none of us simply considered this till now. Thanks -- Karol Lewandowski, Samsung R&D Institute Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/