Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753602AbaJaR25 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:28:57 -0400 Received: from mail.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.52]:46588 "EHLO mail.csclub.uwaterloo.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751974AbaJaR24 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:28:56 -0400 From: "Lennart Sorensen" Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:28:54 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Heiko Schocher , Len Sorensen , Mugunthan V N , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: drivers: net: cpsw: Fix broken loop condition in switch mode Message-ID: <20141031172854.GJ24110@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 0d961b3b52f566f823070ce2366511a7f64b928c (drivers: net: cpsw: fix buggy loop condition) accidentally fixed a loop comparison in too many places while fixing a real bug. It was correct to fix the dual_emac mode section since there 'i' is used as an index into priv->slaves which is a 0 based array. However the other two changes (which are only used in switch mode) are wrong since there 'i' is actually the ALE port number, and port 0 is the host port, while port 1 and up are the slave ports. Putting the loop condition back in the switch mode section fixes it. A comment has been added to point out the intent clearly to avoid future confusion. Also a comment is fixed that said the opposite of what was actually happening. Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen Acked-by: Heiko Schocher diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 952e1e4..4683196 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable) if (enable) { unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ; - /* Disable Learn for all ports */ - for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) { + /* Disable Learn for all ports (host is port 0 and slaves are port 1 and up */ + for (i = 0; i <= priv->data.slaves; i++) { cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i, ALE_PORT_NOLEARN, 1); cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i, @@ -616,11 +616,11 @@ static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable) cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, 0, ALE_P0_UNI_FLOOD, 1); dev_dbg(&ndev->dev, "promiscuity enabled\n"); } else { - /* Flood All Unicast Packets to Host port */ + /* Don't Flood All Unicast Packets to Host port */ cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, 0, ALE_P0_UNI_FLOOD, 0); - /* Enable Learn for all ports */ - for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) { + /* Enable Learn for all ports (host is port 0 and slaves are port 1 and up */ + for (i = 0; i <= priv->data.slaves; i++) { cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i, ALE_PORT_NOLEARN, 0); cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i, -- Len Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/