Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:11:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:11:48 -0500 Received: from [210.212.54.4] ([210.212.54.4]:22533 "EHLO mail.cse.iitk.ac.in") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:11:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 02:35:05 +0530 (IST) From: Ashish Gupta To: gashish@cse.iitk.ac.in cc: kernelnewbies@humbolt.nl.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: problem in BOGOmips In-Reply-To: <3A6C802C.9380961A@earthlink.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I want to use bogomips as the indicator of CPU capability for different architectures. I have found following values from /proc/cpuinfo for different CPUs. MHz bogomips version 233 intel 233 2.2.9, 2.0.36 166 intel 331 2.2.9 450 AMD-K6 900 2.2.14 800 intel 1600 2.2.16 Why there is a exceptional behaviour of bogomips for 233 intel ? If there is some patch or changes then please indicate so that i can use it. Thanks in advance Ashish Gupta - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/