Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:33:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:33:24 -0500 Received: from windsormachine.com ([206.48.122.28]:22537 "EHLO router.windsormachine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:33:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:41:11 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Dresser To: GrandMasterLee cc: Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance In-Reply-To: <1039827325.31718.27.camel@UberGeek> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 930 Lines: 23 On 13 Dec 2002, GrandMasterLee wrote: > there. On my quad P4 Xeon 1.6Ghz with 1M L3 cache, I can compile a > kernel in about 35 seconds. Mind you that's my own config, not > *everything*. On a dual athlon MP at 1.8 Ghz, I get about 5 mins or so. > Both are running with make -jx where X is the saturation value. Something seems odd about the athlon MP time, I've got a celeron 533 with slow disks that does a pretty standard make dep ; make of 2.4.20 in 7m05, which is not that much different considering it's a third the speed, and one cpu instead of two. The single P4/2.53 in another machine can haul down in 3m17s Guess our kernel .config's or version must vary greatly. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/