Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 08:36:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 08:36:21 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:64004 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 08:36:20 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200212141355.gBEDtb7q000952@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: Symlink indirection To: andrew@walrond.org (Andrew Walrond) Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:55:37 +0000 (GMT) Cc: jhf@rivenstone.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3DFB2859.80401@walrond.org> from "Andrew Walrond" at Dec 14, 2002 12:47:21 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1041 Lines: 44 > > I don't understand what you are trying to explain. Do you mean a > > union mount, or a variation thereof? > > > > I thought Al Viro was going to do union mount support for 2.5, but > > I haven't heard about it in a while. Maybe it went in and no one noticed? > I'm not familiar with the phrase 'union mount' and although google gives > wads of hits, I can't find a good description of it > > What I mean is (contrived example with made-up mount option --overlay) > mkdir a > echo "a/x" > a/x > echo "a/y" > a/y > echo "a/z" > a/z > > mkdir b > echo "b/y" > b/y > > mkdir c > echo "c/z" > c/z > > mkdir d > mount --bind a d > mount --bind --overlay b d > mount --bind --overlay c d > > cat d/x > "a/x" > > cat d/y > "b/x" Shouldn't that be "b/y"? > cat d/z > "c/z" John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/