Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751919AbaKDJQU (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:16:20 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:58563 "EHLO mail-ig0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbaKDJQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:16:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:16:09 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Paul Bolle Cc: gyungoh@gmail.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, jg1.han@samsung.com, cooloney@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, heiko@sntech.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, shawn.guo@freescale.com, treding@nvidia.com, florian.vaussard@epfl.ch, trivial@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, andrew@lunn.ch, jic23@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v6 1/8] mfd: Add support for Skyworks SKY81452 driver Message-ID: <20141104091609.GI17577@x1> References: <1414393369-31583-1-git-send-email-jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com> <1414739322-12487-1-git-send-email-jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com> <1414739322-12487-2-git-send-email-jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com> <20141103171451.GG12011@x1> <1415050088.20372.72.camel@x220> <20141103223022.GE13359@x1> <1415091946.20372.136.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1415091946.20372.136.camel@x220> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 22:30 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 17:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > That patch makes REGULATOR_SKY81452 depend on MFD_SKY81452, > > > making it buildable. > > > > Okay, so I can take this patch with no fall-out then. > > Nothing will break. But I think Mark prefers the dependency rename, now > done in 7/8, to be done as part of this patch. I don't agree. The rename should be taken independantly by Mark. The regulator driver won't build until they match anyway, so there's no hard dependency. Unless someone can give me a really good reason to revert it, I'm applying this driver now. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/