Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753266AbaKDK30 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 05:29:26 -0500 Received: from mail.karo-electronics.de ([81.173.242.67]:49173 "EHLO mail.karo-electronics.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbaKDK3W convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 05:29:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:29:12 +0100 From: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= To: David Miller Cc: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= , fabio.estevam@freescale.com, Frank.Li@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: net: fec: fix regression on i.MX28 introduced by rx_copybreak support Message-ID: <20141104112912.2be8bf1a@ipc1.ka-ro> In-Reply-To: <20141031063210.69004315@ipc1.ka-ro> References: <1414502584-10583-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <20141029.153430.1036004676442879956.davem@davemloft.net> <20141030075104.05e44b43@ipc1.ka-ro> <20141030.121710.1524000348187962764.davem@davemloft.net> <20141031063210.69004315@ipc1.ka-ro> Organization: Ka-Ro electronics GmbH X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > David Miller wrote: > > From: Lothar Waßmann > > Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:51:04 +0100 > > > > >> Also, I don't thnk your DIV_ROUND_UP() eliminate for the loop > > >> in swap_buffer() is valid. The whole point is that the current > > >> code handles buffers which have a length which is not a multiple > > >> of 4 properly, after your change it will no longer do so. > > >> > > > Do you really think so? > > > > Yes, because you're rounding down so you'll miss the final > > partial word (if any). > > > Nope. DIV_ROUND_UP() would give '1' as upper bound for lengths from 1 to > 4, '2' for lengths from 5 to 8 and so on. > > The loop with increment 4 and i < len does exactly the same. > Try it for yourself, if you don't believe it. > > Do you still think, the loop without DIV_ROUND_UP() is incorrect, or can this patch be applied? Lothar Waßmann -- ___________________________________________________________ Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10 Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996 www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de ___________________________________________________________ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/