Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754397AbaKDOuL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:50:11 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51430 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753723AbaKDOuH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:50:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:50:02 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Johannes Weiner Cc: David Miller , kirill@shutemov.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vdavydov@parallels.com, tj@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mm: embed the memcg pointer directly into struct page Message-ID: <20141104145002.GE22207@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20141103210607.GA24091@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <20141103213628.GA11428@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org> <20141103215206.GB24091@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <20141103.165807.2039166055692354811.davem@davemloft.net> <20141103223626.GA12006@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org> <20141104130652.GC22207@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20141104134841.GB18441@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141104134841.GB18441@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 04-11-14 08:48:41, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:06:52PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > The code size grows (~1.5k) most probably due to struct page pointer > > arithmetic (but I haven't checked that) but the data section shrinks > > for SLAB. So we have additional 1.6k for SLUB. I guess this is > > acceptable. > > > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 8427489 887684 3186688 12501861 bec365 mmotm/vmlinux.slab > > 8429060 883588 3186688 12499336 beb988 page_cgroup/vmlinux.slab > > > > 8438894 883428 3186688 12509010 bedf52 mmotm/vmlinux.slub > > 8440529 883428 3186688 12510645 bee5b5 page_cgroup/vmlinux.slub > > That's unexpected. It's not much, but how could the object size grow > at all when that much code is removed and we replace the lookups with > simple struct member accesses? Are you positive these are the right > object files, in the right order? Double checked (the base is [1] and page_cgroup refers to these 3 patches). Please note that this is a distribution config (OpenSUSE 13.2) so it enables a lot of things. And I would really expect that 36B resp. 40B pointer arithmetic will do more instructions than 32B and this piles up when it is used all over the place. memcontrol.o shrinks 0.2k $ size {mmotm,page_cgroup}/mm/memcontrol.o text data bss dec hex filename 25337 3095 2 28434 6f12 mmotm/mm/memcontrol.o 25123 3095 2 28220 6e3c page_cgroup/mm/memcontrol.o and page_cgroup.o saves 0.5k $ size mmotm/mm/page_cgroup.o page_cgroup/mm/swap_cgroup.o text data bss dec hex filename 1419 24 352 1795 703 mmotm/mm/page_cgroup.o 849 24 348 1221 4c5 page_cgroup/mm/swap_cgroup.o But built-in.o files grow or keep the same size (this is with CONFIG_SLAB and gcc 4.8.2) $ size {mmotm,page_cgroup}/*/built-in.o | sort -k1 -n | awk '!/text/{new = (i++ % 2); if (!new) {val = $1; last_line=$0} else if ($1-val != 0) {diff = $1 - val; printf("%s\n%s diff %d\n", last_line, $0, diff); sum+=diff}}END{printf("Sum diff %d\n", sum)}' 14481 19586 81 34148 8564 mmotm/init/built-in.o 14483 19586 81 34150 8566 page_cgroup/init/built-in.o diff 2 68679 2082 12 70773 11475 mmotm/crypto/built-in.o 68711 2082 12 70805 11495 page_cgroup/crypto/built-in.o diff 32 131583 26496 2376 160455 272c7 mmotm/lib/built-in.o 131631 26496 2376 160503 272f7 page_cgroup/lib/built-in.o diff 48 229809 12346 1548 243703 3b7f7 mmotm/block/built-in.o 229937 12346 1548 243831 3b877 page_cgroup/block/built-in.o diff 128 308015 20442 16280 344737 542a1 mmotm/security/built-in.o 308031 20442 16280 344753 542b1 page_cgroup/security/built-in.o diff 16 507979 47110 27236 582325 8e2b5 mmotm/mm/built-in.o 508540 47110 27236 582886 8e4e6 page_cgroup/mm/built-in.o diff 561 1033752 77064 13212 1124028 1126bc mmotm/fs/built-in.o 1033784 77064 13212 1124060 1126dc page_cgroup/fs/built-in.o diff 32 1099218 51979 33512 1184709 1213c5 mmotm/net/built-in.o 1099282 51979 33512 1184773 121405 page_cgroup/net/built-in.o diff 64 1180475 127020 705068 2012563 1eb593 mmotm/kernel/built-in.o 1180683 127020 705068 2012771 1eb663 page_cgroup/kernel/built-in.o diff 208 2193400 152698 34856 2380954 24549a mmotm/drivers/built-in.o 2193528 152698 34856 2381082 24551a page_cgroup/drivers/built-in.o diff 128 Sum diff 1219 this is not a complete list but mm part eats only 0.5k the rest is small but it adds up. > > So to me it sounds like the savings for 64b are worth minor inconvenience > > for 32b which is clearly on decline and I would definitely not encourage > > people to use PAE kernels with a lot of memory where the difference > > might matter. For the most x86 32b deployments (laptops with 4G) the > > difference shouldn't be noticeable. I am not familiar with other archs > > so the situation might be different there. > > On 32 bit, the overhead is 0.098% of memory, so 4MB on a 4G machine. > This should be acceptable, even for the three people that run on the > cutting edge of 3.18-based PAE distribution kernels. :-) > > > This should probably go into the changelog, I guess. > > Which part? About potential increased memory footprint on 32b systems (aka don't sell it as a full win ;)) --- [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git/tag/?h=since-3.17&id=mmotm-2014-10-29-14-19 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/