Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 07:18:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 07:18:13 -0500 Received: from 3eea160b.cable.wanadoo.nl ([62.234.22.11]:16261 "EHLO asterix.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 07:18:12 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:25:54 +0100 From: Rogier Wolff To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Cc: Mark Hahn , Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: 2.5.51 load avg += 1 Message-ID: <20021215132554.D3779@bitwizard.nl> References: <200212151202.09618.roy@karlsbakk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212151202.09618.roy@karlsbakk.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Organization: BitWizard.nl Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 896 Lines: 21 On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:02:09PM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > On Saturday 14 December 2002 19:58, Mark Hahn wrote: > > > running 2.5.51, when I run 'uptime', it shows my uptime+1. that means if > > > my > > > > might you have a process/thread stuck in a short wait? > > how can this be? the load average was at the given point excactly 1.0, but the > number of running processes (ps ax|grep -v grep | grep -w R) was 0. Processes in "D" state also count towards the load average. Because usually that means a "disk wait" which usually impacts subjective-performance of the system just as much as the "running" processes do. Roger. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/