Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751065AbaKEWNO (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:13:14 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:45088 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750926AbaKEWNM (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:13:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1415225591.3444747.187568145.134CEE91@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: OsWyiODkv3Ay+zCqBlODb/Q5n2pRUuHn40ArTlHovsyG 1415225591 From: Martin Tournoij To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Austin S Hemmelgarn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-c51dec4f In-Reply-To: <20141105201404.GH27083@thunk.org> References: <1415200663.3247743.187387481.75CE9317@webmail.messagingengine.com> <545A7B00.1040309@gmail.com> <20141105201404.GH27083@thunk.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] The SIGINFO signal from BSD Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:13:11 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, at 20:31, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote: > The people to talk to about that for the core > utilities on Linux would be the maintainers of the GNU coreutils, or > whatever your distribution might use in their place (I think it's very > unlikely that busybox or toybox would implement it however). Well, if the kernel doesn't provide the feature, then we can be sure it will never be implemented :-) I thought this was a good place to start asking,, and even if GNU coreutils opt to not implement this for whatever reasons, other applications still can (mine will!) Besides, there are already many tools which use this feature when available, these would for with no or minimal adjustments. On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, at 21:14, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > In a world where we have a GUI desktop, I suspect implementing ^T is > much less interesting but if someone were to submit a patch to at > least make ^T send a SIGINFO, I can't think of a reason why it > wouldn't be accepted. (BTW, if you're going to do this, note that ^T > could be remapped to any control character via stty; so to do this we > would need to define an extra index in c_cc[] array in the struct > termios.) Thanks, this is what I needed :-) I wondered if there is a specific reason it's not implemented, or if it was just something no one ever did. I can start my investigation in the kernel sources ;) Thanks, Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/