Message-ID: <545ABF6C.1000308@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:23:08 -0600
From: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <jason@lakedaemon.net>, <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>, <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
        <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 2/2] irqchip: gicv2m: Add supports for ARM GICv2m
 MSI(-X)
References: <1415052977-26036-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
 <1415052977-26036-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
 <5458CE31.3040404@linux.intel.com> <545ABB4C.8010103@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <545ABB4C.8010103@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 11/5/2014 6:05 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> - Overall, it seems that msi_domain_alloc() could be quite different
> across architectures. Would it be possible to declare this function as
> weak, and allow arch to override (similar to arch_setup_msi_irq)?

Actually, declaring "msi_domain_ops" as non-static, and allow other code 
to override the .alloc and .free?

Thanks,

Suravee


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/