Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751391AbaKFEis (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:38:48 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:63932 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbaKFEip (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:38:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:38:29 +0900 From: Gyungoh Yoo To: Mark Brown Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, jg1.han@samsung.com, cooloney@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, heiko@sntech.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, shawn.guo@freescale.com, treding@nvidia.com, florian.vaussard@epfl.ch, trivial@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, andrew@lunn.ch, jic23@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v6 7/8] regulator: sky81452: Add compatible string for device binding Message-ID: <20141106043828.GA5068@jack-ThinkPad-T520> References: <1414393369-31583-1-git-send-email-jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com> <1414739322-12487-1-git-send-email-jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com> <1414739322-12487-8-git-send-email-jack.yoo@skyworksinc.com> <20141031164418.GC18557@sirena.org.uk> <20141104004333.GA2965@jack-ThinkPad-T520> <20141104005329.GA3815@sirena.org.uk> <20141104054534.GA4108@jack-ThinkPad-T520> <20141104114120.GJ3815@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141104114120.GJ3815@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:41:20AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:53:29AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I'm having a hard time understanding why it is difficult to split the > > > two changes - they are in completely separate files. > > > I am sorry for the hard time. > > > That was because the symbol changes had a dependency with 1/8. > > In this case, Should Kconfig symbol change back from MFD_SKY81452 > > to SKY81452 in this patch series? And then should I submit to change to MFD_SKY81452 > > with seperate patch? > > No, what I'm saying is that if you want to rename the Kconfig symbol you > should do that as part of a separate patch to changing the DT stuff. I see. I will split this patch. One is for DT stuff and the other is for Kconfig symbol rename. Thank you for your comment. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/