Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751216AbaKFFBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:01:48 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:51654 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750768AbaKFFBr (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:01:47 -0500 Message-ID: <545B00B9.5090108@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:01:45 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Branden , Ulf Hansson , Russell King , Peter Griffin , Chris Ball , Piotr Krol CC: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ray Jui , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] mmc: shdci-bcm2835: add verify for 32-bit back-to-back workaround References: <1414651017-3545-1-git-send-email-sbranden@broadcom.com> <1414651017-3545-5-git-send-email-sbranden@broadcom.com> <5459AECF.8000402@wwwdotorg.org> <5459CB17.3020303@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <5459CB17.3020303@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/05/2014 12:00 AM, Scott Branden wrote: > On 14-11-04 08:59 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/30/2014 12:36 AM, Scott Branden wrote: >>> Add a verify option to driver to print out an error message if a >>> potential back to back write could cause a clock domain issue. >> >>> index f8c450a..11af27f 100644 >> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_BCM2835_VERIFY_WORKAROUND >>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); >>> + struct bcm2835_sdhci_host *bcm2835_host = pltfm_host->priv; >>> + >>> + if (bcm2835_host->previous_reg == reg) { >>> + if ((reg != SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL) >>> + && (reg != SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL)) { >> >> The comment in patch 3 says the problem doesn't apply to the data >> register. Why does this check for these two registers rather than data? > This Verify workaround patch still a work in progress. I'm still > getting more info from the silicon designers on the back-to-back > register writes that are affect. The spew of 0x20 or 0x28 or 0x2c > register writes are all ok locations that don't need to be worked > around. This patch needs to be corrected with the proper register rules > still. FYI, I applied the series except for this patch, and everything /appeared/ to work OK for a brief test (boot, log in, reboot). Still, I'll hold off my Tested-by/acked-by until the comment in patch 3 and the register list above match, and there's no log spew with everything applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/