Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751535AbaKFMqj (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 07:46:39 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:51651 "EHLO mail-ie0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963AbaKFMqg (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2014 07:46:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1414528433-9650-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <1414528433-9650-5-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <20141105200129.B4438C41C40@trevor.secretlab.ca> From: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 12:46:15 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Rr386xwgNM0-OjnoOJtqJBV07rM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] of: Add old prop argument on OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY To: Pantelis Antoniou Cc: Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Matt Porter , Koen Kooi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alison Chaiken , Dinh Nguyen , Jan Lubbe , Alexander Sverdlin , Michael Stickel , Guenter Roeck , Dirk Behme , Alan Tull , Sascha Hauer , Michael Bohan , Ionut Nicu , Michal Simek , Matt Ranostay , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , Pete Popov , Dan Malek , Georgi Vlaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Grant, > >> On Nov 5, 2014, at 22:01 , Grant Likely wrote: >> >> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:33:52 +0200 >> , Pantelis Antoniou >> wrote: >>> The notifier now includes the old_prop argument when updating >>> properties, propagate this API to changeset internals while >>> also retaining the old behaviour of retrieving the old_property >>> when NULL is passed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou >> >> I'm still fuzzy on the need for this patch. Is this just an optimization >> so that the property doesn't get looked up twice? Or is there a reason >> when the oldprop really needs to be passed in explicitly? >> > > In the case of overlay's applying a property change the old property has > been already retrieved. Passing it as an argument saves us a traversal of the > property list. > > On the original series were removal was supported, the old property was required > since you can't find the old property anymore on the node (it was on another list). > > When we go back to revisit the removal case, that API is useful. Since we're not doing removal anymore, lets drop this patch. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/