Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:57:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:57:37 -0500 Received: from ore.jhcloos.com ([64.240.156.239]:4356 "EHLO ore.jhcloos.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 06:57:36 -0500 To: Kernel Mailing List Cc: Linus Torvalds , bcollins@debian.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.52 References: <20021216102639.A27589@infradead.org> From: "James H. Cloos Jr." In-Reply-To: <20021216102639.A27589@infradead.org> Date: 16 Dec 2002 07:05:24 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 857 Lines: 16 >>>>> "CH" == Christoph Hellwig writes: Linus> Ben Collins : o IEEE-1394/Firewire update CH> This merge looks fishy. It seems to be yet another let's throw my CVS CH> repo in merge and backs out Al's work yo get rid of lots of devfs crap. FWIW (which may be little) the ieee1394 code in 2.5.51 simply does not work and the svn tree (same code as in 2.5.52) does. For those of us who depend on sbp2 for day-to-day functionality it makes current 2.5 possible.... That said, less divergence between Linus' bk tree and linux1394.org's svn tree would be welcome. -JimC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/