Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:48:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:48:29 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:48287 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:48:28 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Andrew Theurer To: "Brian Jackson" , "Scott Robert Ladd" Subject: Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:52:35 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" References: <20021216135453.3823.qmail@escalade.vistahp.com> In-Reply-To: <20021216135453.3823.qmail@escalade.vistahp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200212160952.35078.habanero@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 693 Lines: 15 On Monday 16 December 2002 07:54, Brian Jackson wrote: > You could always boot once with nosmp and run some benchmarks and then > reboot (with smp) and run some more benchmarks, and see if there is a > difference. Yes, but wouldn't booting a UP kernel be a better comparison? After all, why incur any possible overhead of an SMP kernel if you don't need to? Some benchmarks may not show a difference, but some definitely will. -Andrew Theurer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/