Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751328AbaKGHjO (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 02:39:14 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:3293 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbaKGHjK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 02:39:10 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,330,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="628174035" Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:37:20 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: LKP , Matt Fleming , Leif Lindholm , LKML Subject: Re: [LKP] [dmi] PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:ffffffff81899e6b error 9 cr2 ffffffffff240000 Message-ID: <20141107073720.GB24745@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20141107054741.GB30507@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 7 November 2014 06:47, LKP wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the below changes on > > > > https://git.linaro.org/people/ard.biesheuvel/linux-arm efi-for-3.19 > > commit aacdce6e880894acb57d71dcb2e3fc61b4ed4e96 ("dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 64-bit entry point") > > > > > > +-----------------------+------------+------------+ > > | | 2fa165a26c | aacdce6e88 | > > +-----------------------+------------+------------+ > > | boot_successes | 20 | 10 | > > | early-boot-hang | 1 | | > > | boot_failures | 0 | 5 | > > | PANIC:early_exception | 0 | 5 | > > +-----------------------+------------+------------+ > > > > > > [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000036fffffff] usable > > [ 0.000000] bootconsole [earlyser0] enabled > > [ 0.000000] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active > > PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:ffffffff81899e6b error 9 cr2 ffffffffff240000 > > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-gc5221e6 #1 > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 ffffffff82203d30 ffffffff819f0a6e 00000000000003f8 > > [ 0.000000] ffffffffff240000 ffffffff82203e18 ffffffff823701b0 ffffffff82511401 > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000000ba3 0000000000000000 ffffffffff240000 > > [ 0.000000] Call Trace: > > [ 0.000000] [] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 > > [ 0.000000] [] early_idt_handler+0x90/0xb7 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? dmi_save_one_device+0x81/0x81 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? dmi_table+0x3f/0x94 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? dmi_table+0x16/0x94 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? dmi_save_one_device+0x81/0x81 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? dmi_save_one_device+0x81/0x81 > > [ 0.000000] [] dmi_walk_early+0x44/0x69 > > [ 0.000000] [] dmi_present+0x180/0x1ff > > [ 0.000000] [] dmi_scan_machine+0x144/0x191 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 > > [ 0.000000] [] setup_arch+0x490/0xc73 > > [ 0.000000] [] ? printk+0x4d/0x4f > > [ 0.000000] [] start_kernel+0x9c/0x43f > > [ 0.000000] [] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > > [ 0.000000] [] x86_64_start_kernel+0x13b/0x14a > > [ 0.000000] RIP 0x4 > > > > This is most puzzling. Could anyone decode the exception? > This looks like the non-EFI path through dmi_scan_machine(), which > calls dmi_present() /after/ calling dmi_smbios3_present(), which > apparently has not found the _SM3_ header tag. Or could the call stack > be inaccurate? > > Anyway, it would be good to know the exact type of the platform, It's a Nehalem-EP machine, wht 16 CPU and 12G memory. > and > perhaps we could find out if there is an inadvertent _SM3_ tag > somewhere in the 0xF0000 - 0xFFFFF range? Sorry, how? --yliu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/