Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751823AbaKGJ4l (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 04:56:41 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:24136 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797AbaKGJ4g (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 04:56:36 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,331,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="628225735" Message-ID: <1415354191.958.307.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Block: Add blk-mq support From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Christoph Hellwig , axboe@fb.com, ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:56:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <545C96A1.40304@nod.at> References: <1414933255-3795-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20141103081821.GA5261@infradead.org> <54573B72.1060600@nod.at> <1415353596.958.302.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <545C96A1.40304@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 10:53 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 07.11.2014 um 10:46 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 09:23 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> Am 03.11.2014 um 09:18 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > >>> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >>>> +#define UBIBLOCK_SG_COUNT 64 > >>> > >>> > >>> Can you document why you choose this number? The default nr_request > >>> for the old code would be 128. > >> > >> Is 64 a problem? Beside of the fact that I forgot to set blk_queue_max_segments(). > >> I used this number because 128 seemed a bit high and my goal was to > >> keep the memory footprint small. > >> This is also why I've set tag_set.queue_depth to 64. > > > > The request was to document, so lets' document the choice. > > Of course I'll document it. But so far I had no time to do a > v2 of this patch. Your reply just sounded like you are complaining to the request (starts with "is this a problem?"). And it looked like you try to defend the 64 choice, while no one challenged it. So my e-mail is to just kindly help you by pointing that the request was to only add a piece of doc so far, in case you misinterpreted it. Artem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/