Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751985AbaKGMc0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:32:26 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50628 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751993AbaKGMcX (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:32:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 06:31:54 -0600 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Seth Jennings , Jiri Kosina , Steven Rostedt , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, kpatch@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kernel Live Patching Message-ID: <20141107123154.GA4071@treble.redhat.com> References: <1415284748-14648-1-git-send-email-sjenning@redhat.com> <20141106184446.GA12779@infradead.org> <20141106185157.GB29272@suse.cz> <20141106185857.GA7106@infradead.org> <20141106202423.GB2266@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141106202423.GB2266@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:58:57AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:51:57PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > I don't think this specific example was generated. > > > > > > I also don't think including the whole kpatch automation into the kernel > > > tree is a viable development model for it. (Same would apply for kGraft > > > automation.) > > > > Why? We (IMHO incorrectly) used the argument of tight coupling to put > > perf into the kernel tree. Generating kernel live patches is way more > > integrated that it absolutely has to go into the tree to be able to do > > proper development on it in an integrated fashion. > > One reason is that there are currently at least two generators using > very different methods of generation (in addition to the option of doing > the patch module by hand), and neither of them are currently in a state > where they would be ready for inclusion into the kernel (although the > kpatch one is clearly closer to that). What generator does kGraft have? Is that the one that generates the source patch, or is there one that generates a binary patch module? -- Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/