Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752446AbaKGQNB (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 11:13:01 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37030 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555AbaKGQNA (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 11:13:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:12:58 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Konrad Zapalowicz Cc: jslaby@suse.cz, cascardo@linux.vnet.ibm.com, markh@compro.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, lidza.louina@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: dgnc: Remove driver in favor of serial/jsm driver Message-ID: <20141107161258.GA12566@kroah.com> References: <20141106191808.GA32427@kroah.com> <1415315135-29716-1-git-send-email-bergo.torino@gmail.com> <1415315135-29716-2-git-send-email-bergo.torino@gmail.com> <1415315135-29716-3-git-send-email-bergo.torino@gmail.com> <1415315135-29716-4-git-send-email-bergo.torino@gmail.com> <20141106232012.GA8585@kroah.com> <20141106233623.GJ29761@t400> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141106233623.GJ29761@t400> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:36:23AM +0100, Konrad Zapalowicz wrote: > On 11/06, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:05:34AM +0100, Konrad Zapalowicz wrote: > > > This commit removes the staging/dgnc driver in favor of the serial/jsm > > > driver. > > > > > > This is because the serial/jsm driver now supports all of the hardware > > > that has been supported by the staging/dgnc plus it offers better > > > overall quality. > > > > > > Given above the staging/dgnc is obsolete now. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Zapalowicz > > > > I've applied the other patches in this series, but am going to skip this > > one at the moment until I get some "it works for me" verification from > > someone who has this hardware. > > I will have some patches following-up this series, mostly fixing some > minor stuff that I found going through the current jsm code plus the > stuff that can now be shared between neo and cls code. So should I send > it and it will end up in the tty testing tree or wait till my patches > will make it to the next/mainline. Please send them whenever you have them done and you feel they are correct. > In case you want the patches should I mark them somehow so that you know > it is something that should go to the tty testing tree? If you just send them saying it is against my tty-testing (or tty-next, as your patches are now merged into that), it's fine. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/