MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20141107104025.GC4585@leverpostej>
References: <1415319665-21701-1-git-send-email-anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>
	<CAOMFOmXDqhwCk1pRf_9yGycboMqt-ZE33y=kZrhbqXOjVcrxYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<545C4783.8070506@nvidia.com>
	<20141107104025.GC4585@leverpostej>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:24:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOMFOmWfgtN+Q-sbQUS8-90pTrtk5Du8xkDVXaed=teVPb8sbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Copy register_persistent_clock() to arm64
 source subtree
From: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Hi

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:16:03AM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 11/06/2014 05:25 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> > +Stephen
>> >
>> > This patch is for tegra20_timer that uses register_persistent_clock().
>> > I did not find any way to share the same arch code for arm/arm64.
>> >
>> > Actually this register_persistent_clock() does not look arm specific
>> > at all. Would it be better to move it somewhere outside of arch/?
>>
>> No CC to linux-tegra@ or the other Tegra maintainers?
>>
>> Yes, I think it'd be best not to have arch-specific APIs, or cut/paste
>> the same code into multiple places.
>
> Agreed. This looks in no way architecture specific, and having this in
> common code would be preferable to copying.

Where the code common for arm and arm64 should go?
drivers/???/arm_timekeeping.c ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/