Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752991AbaKGSbB (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:31:01 -0500 Received: from mail-gw1-out.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.62]:47147 "EHLO mail-gw1-out.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752505AbaKGSbA (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:31:00 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,334,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="50384061" Message-ID: <545D0FD5.1080605@broadcom.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:30:45 -0800 From: Scott Branden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren , Ulf Hansson , Russell King , "Peter Griffin" , Chris Ball , "Piotr Krol" CC: , , Joe Perches , , Ray Jui , Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: add sdhci quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12 References: <1414651017-3545-1-git-send-email-sbranden@broadcom.com> <1414651017-3545-6-git-send-email-sbranden@broadcom.com> <5459AEEA.8050503@wwwdotorg.org> <5459CB76.3060601@broadcom.com> <545AFE2C.5050105@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <545AFE2C.5050105@wwwdotorg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14-11-05 08:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/05/2014 12:02 AM, Scott Branden wrote: >> On 14-11-04 09:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 10/30/2014 12:36 AM, Scott Branden wrote: >>>> SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12 is missing and needed for this >>>> controller. >>> >>> This seems fine, although any explanation of why this quirk is needed >>> would be useful. >>> >> I don't know who to talk to at Arasan about this. Will try hunting >> around a little for more info as to why this is needed to have eMMC and >> SD work properly through our internal testing on other non-2835 chipset >> that shares the same SDHCI controller as 2835. > > I thought I heard that this wasn't a bug in the controller itself, but > rather an integration issue between the IP core and the register bus > it's attached to. Consequently, it may be SoC-specific or at least have > SoC-specific variations? Yes, this patch is to fix a different bug (in the IP) rather than the clock domain integration issue. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/