Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:42:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:42:27 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:18954 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:42:26 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Date: 16 Dec 2002 15:50:04 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <20021216223848.GA2994@werewolf.able.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 943 Lines: 23 Followup to: By author: "Scott Robert Ladd" In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > From what I can see, HT provides a 0-15% increase in performance, depending > heavily on the type of code being run. In other words, HT helps, but it is > *no* substitute for true multiple processors. And it is ONLY of value when > an SMP kernel is in use. > It would be interesting to compare an UP kernel with HT off to an SMP kernel with the HT on... -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/