Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:52:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:52:18 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:1420 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:52:17 -0500 Message-ID: <3DFE690D.7000602@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 03:00:13 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results References: <20021216225257.5871.qmail@linuxmail.org> <3DFE5D3B.4030402@namesys.com> <3DFE60EC.3DDA2669@digeo.com> <3DFE63D3.B4D3308B@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3DFE63D3.B4D3308B@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 35 Andrew Morton wrote: >Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>Hans Reiser wrote: >> >> >>>Andrew and Chris, are these changes in performance definitely due to VM >>>changes (and not some difference I am not thinking of between 2.5 and >>>2.4 reiserfs code)? >>> >>> >>> >>aim9 is just doing >> >> for (lots) >> close(creat(filename)) >> >> > unlink(filename); /* of course */ > > > > Oh, commercial fs vendors must really love tuning for this benchmark.... sigh.... Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/