Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752914AbaKJOTS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:19:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:36811 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752711AbaKJOTR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:19:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20141109091932.GJ2722@sirena.org.uk> References: <1415448772-3895-1-git-send-email-badarkhe.manish@gmail.com> <20141109091932.GJ2722@sirena.org.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:49:16 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65218: Remove '.owner' field From: Manish Badarkhe To: Mark Brown Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Liam Girdwood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:42:52PM +0530, Manish Badarkhe wrote: >> Remove '.owner' field of driver structure as it is >> going to be filled via "module_platform_driver" call. > > Same question as ever with this stuff: if we've decided to do this why > are we doing it for a single driver and not as a genric cleanup? There are many drivers needs to be changed with such fix. Can we fix drivers with this fix module by module or all at once? Please let me know your opinion. Thanks Manish Badarkhe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/