Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752426AbaKJTGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:06:23 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:33521 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751109AbaKJTGV (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:06:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:06:17 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Chen Yucong Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86, mce: support memory error recovery for both UCNA and Deferred error in machine_check_poll Message-ID: <20141110190617.GJ4359@pd.tnic> References: <1415410821-15063-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com> <1415410821-15063-3-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1415410821-15063-3-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:40:21AM +0800, Chen Yucong wrote: > Uncorrected no action required (UCNA) - is a uncorrected recoverable > machine check error that is not signaled via a machine check exception > and, instead, is reported to system software as a corrected machine > check error. UCNA errors indicate that some data in the system is > corrupted, but the data has not been consumed and the processor state > is valid and you may continue execution on this processor. UCNA errors > require no action from system software to continue execution. Note that > UCNA errors are supported by the processor only when IA32_MCG_CAP[24] > (MCG_SER_P) is set. > -- Intel SDM Volume 3B > > Deferred errors are errors that cannot be corrected by hardware, but > do not cause an immediate interruption in program flow, loss of data > integrity, or corruption of processor state. These errors indicate > that data has been corrupted but not consumed. Hardware writes information > to the status and address registers in the corresponding bank that > identifies the source of the error if deferred errors are enabled for > logging. Deferred errors are not reported via machine check exceptions; > they can be seen by polling the MCi_STATUS registers. > -- AMD64 APM Volume 2 > > Above two items, both UCNA and Deferred errors belong to detected > errors, but they can't be corrected by hardware, and this is very > similar to Software Recoverable Action Optional (SRAO) errors. > Therefore, we can take some actions that have been used for handling > SRAO errors to handle UCNA and Deferred errors. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c > index 453e9bf..4b6e4cdf 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c > @@ -575,6 +575,41 @@ static void mce_read_aux(struct mce *m, int i) > } > } > > +static bool memory_error(struct mce *m) > +{ > + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; > + > + if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) { > + /* > + * AMD BKDGs - Machine Check Error Codes > + * > + * Bit 8 of ErrCode[15:0] of MCi_STATUS is used for indicating > + * a memory-specific error. Note that this field encodes info- > + * rmation about memory-hierarchy level involved in the error. > + */ > + return (m->status & 0xff00) == BIT(8); Grrr, you copied this from a patch of mine, correct? So if you copy it why did you go and change it up and break it on top of that?! Testing bit 8 is wrong! NAK! Before you go and "fix" this again, wait for me to clear up something else before you even go do that. I'll let you know. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/