Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:26:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:26:07 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-190-179.ca.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.190.179]:26548 "EHLO myware.akkadia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3DFF5FFE.8070305@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:33:50 -0800 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20021216 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dada1 CC: Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance References: <3DFF023E.6030401@redhat.com> <000b01c2a5bd$ebb6e870$760010ac@edumazet> In-Reply-To: <000b01c2a5bd$ebb6e870$760010ac@edumazet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 20 dada1 wrote: > You could have only one routine that would need a relocation / patch at > dynamic linking stage : That's a horrible way to deal with this in DSOs. THere is no writable and executable segment and it would have to be created which means enormous additional setup costs and higher memory requirement. I'm not going to use any scode modification. -- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/