Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:53:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:53:08 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:3855 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:53:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:01:58 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ulrich Drepper cc: Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , , Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance In-Reply-To: <3DFF6501.3080106@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 814 Lines: 21 On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > If you don't like the process-global page thingy (anymore) the > alternative would be a sysconf() system call. Well, we do _have_ the process-global thingy now - it's the vsyscall page. It's not settable by the process, but it's useful for information. Together with an elf AT_ entry pointing to it, it's certainly sufficient for this usage, and it should also be sufficient for "future use" (ie we can add future system information in the page later: bitmaps of features at offset "start + 128" for example). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/