Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:58:35 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
        Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>,
        Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qti.qualcomm.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment
In-Reply-To: <20141110224306.GC29741@lerouge>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411110857480.5148@gentwo.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410311058500.32582@gentwo.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411012003390.5308@nanos> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411011646280.7732@gentwo.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411012313320.5308@nanos> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411061057470.5591@gentwo.org>
 <20141110224306.GC29741@lerouge>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> Ok, I confess we moved part of that housekeeping to the syscall/exception/interrupt
> entry path. We did that for cputime accounting and RCU. And it's possible to
> even do that for timekeeping. But then the kernel entrypoint is going to be extremely
> costly. It's worth CPU 0 as a sacrificial lamb.

Well we can redirect to the scheduler setting the task flag and handle
costly stuff there if necessary?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/