Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:42:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:42:23 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-190-179.ca.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.190.179]:51636 "EHLO myware.akkadia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:42:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3DFF717C.90006@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:48:28 -0800 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20021216 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , hpa@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance References: <3DFF6501.3080106@redhat.com> <1040153030.20804.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1040153030.20804.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 23 Alan Cox wrote: > Is there any reason you can't just keep the linker out of the entire > mess by generating > > .byte whatever > .dword 0xFFFF0000 > > instead of call ? There is no such instruction. Unless you know about some secret undocumented opcode... -- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/