Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:56:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:56:40 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:7908 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:56:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance From: Alan Cox To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , hpa@transmeta.com In-Reply-To: <3DFF717C.90006@redhat.com> References: <3DFF6501.3080106@redhat.com> <1040153030.20804.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <3DFF717C.90006@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 17 Dec 2002 19:44:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1040154273.20804.13.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 21 On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 18:48, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > Is there any reason you can't just keep the linker out of the entire > > mess by generating > > > > .byte whatever > > .dword 0xFFFF0000 > > > > instead of call ? > > There is no such instruction. Unless you know about some secret > undocumented opcode... No I'd forgotten how broken x86 was - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/