Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752112AbaKKSBF (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:01:05 -0500 Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.41]:42312 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbaKKSBD (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:01:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:00:59 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: "Paul E. McKenney" cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Viresh Kumar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Gilad Ben-Yossef , Tejun Heo , John Stultz , Mike Frysinger , Minchan Kim , Hakan Akkan , Max Krasnyansky , Hugh Dickins , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: Future of NOHZ full/isolation development (was Re: [NOHZ] Remove scheduler_tick_max_deferment) In-Reply-To: <20141111173908.GY4901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20141110153147.GK4901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141111171526.GC3216@lerouge> <20141111173908.GY4901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > I guess I should have remembered that before suggesting this to Christoph, > my apologies to all! No this is good. Do not worry. I can just throw out the one or other patch to ensure that the discussion continues and then we can figure out how to come up with a correct solution. Patches are a way to say that you are serious about an issue on lkml. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/