Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:11:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:11:25 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:23557 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:11:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3DFF78B2.1090405@transmeta.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:14 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021119 X-Accept-Language: en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Drepper CC: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance References: <3DFF6501.3080106@redhat.com> <1040153030.20804.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <3DFF717C.90006@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3DFF717C.90006@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 650 Lines: 27 Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > >>Is there any reason you can't just keep the linker out of the entire >>mess by generating >> >> .byte whatever >> .dword 0xFFFF0000 >> >>instead of call ? > > > There is no such instruction. Unless you know about some secret > undocumented opcode... > Well, there is lcall $0xffff0000, $USER_CS... (no, I'm most definitely *not* suggesting it.) -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/