Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:12:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:12:03 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-190-179.ca.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.190.179]:62900 "EHLO myware.akkadia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:11:33 -0500 Message-ID: <3DFF78BE.3040201@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:26 -0800 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20021216 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Matti Aarnio , Hugh Dickins , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 22 Linus Torvalds wrote: > In the meantime, I do agree with you that the TLS approach should work > too, and might be better. It will allow all six arguments to be used if we > just find a good calling conventions If you push out the AT_* patch I'll hack the glibc bits (probably the TLS variant). Won't take too long, you'll get results this afternoon. What about AMD's instruction? Is it as flawed as sysenter? If not and %ebp is available I really should use the TLS method. -- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/